3 Minute read
The New York State Office for the Ageing recently announced plans to distribute ‘robot companions’ to more than 800 older adults in the state.
The plan aims to “battle social isolation” by providing older adults with robots that can initiate conversations, play games and provide general support.
Social isolation is the experience of having insufficient opportunities for human contact and companionship. Although not limited to old age, social isolation can be a problem for some people as they get older and experience reduced mobility or live away from family members and friends.
The robot in question is ElliQ, a smart speaker with a moving ‘head’ that turns to face the human speaker and lights up when talking. Featuring artificial intelligence, ElliQ was made by start-up Israeli company, Intuition Robotics, and is designed to provide support for older adults living alone.
ElliQ also has a pro-active ability to engage users in small talk.
It appears to show ‘empathy’, can suggest activities and reminds people to take medication or attend appointments. It’s accompanied by a touchscreen that allows video calls to friends and family.
The New York State Office for the Ageing website claims that users typically have about 20 daily interactions with the robot.
But using robots for companionship is controversial. Some people worry about replacing human love and care with robot ‘care’. Others worry that robot companions might deceive people about the fact that they are merely machines not conscious beings.
There are also concerns about loss of privacy given the data collected by social robots.
The Office for the Ageing clearly hopes that robot companions will benefit older people, as well as perhaps reducing medical and housing expenditure for older demographics. It says that ElliQ is meant to complement human relationships, not replace them.
But what do older people themselves think about companion robots?
A study by researchers from the University of Melbourne found that some older people are enthusiastic about robots like Elli-Q that provide meaningful information and activities, and that some older people could even imagine having certain robots as companions.
Some found that the way ElliQ piped up and made suggestions for activities or video calls to family was rude, intrusive and controlling. It was offensive to be “told what to do,” as one participant put it.
Other study participants worried that having a robot assistant might make them lazy and less capable. As one person said: “I’d rather not rely on a machine when I can think myself.” It will “shrink our brains,” another warned.
These sentiments are at odds with the intention of helping older people to be more autonomous.
For certain individuals, some smart technology seemed to represent a threat to cognitive and social independence. One interviewee said they would pitch ElliQ “out the back door”.
Another negative reaction concerned older adults’ sense of dignity.
The researchers say some older people were put off by the way the devices were designed to mimic human-like qualities and behaviours. They pointed out that living humans, and animals like dogs, genuinely love or care for people, whereas robots only pretend that they do.
As a result, some older adults felt that humanoid and animal-like companion machines were patronising. In fact, some felt the idea of marketing certain social robots towards older people was condescending to the entire demographic.
"We can’t then ignore the potential for some older people to reject robot assistance and companionship," Coghlan and Waycott say.
"Nonetheless, some older people in our study embraced the idea of having a robot like ElliQ to assist them in tasks and provide conversation to ease loneliness.
"Others were delighted at the thought of robot animals. They even felt there was some value in the artificial “empathy” and “compassion” that these robots might show."
Programs like New York’s needed to be alert to various concerns about rolling out robots, including concerns they may replace genuine human and animal contact. But it also seemed true that some older people could benefit from certain kinds of AI assistance and robot companions.
"Our study shows that older people, like other age groups, have a variety of views about companion robots – both positive and negative. It’s important to hear their perspectives when designing and deploying social robots to address social isolation in this growing demographic."
> Learn more about Artificial Intelligence research at the University of Melbourne.
Written by Dr Simon Coghlan and Associate Professor Jenny Waycott, University of Melbourne.
First published on Pursuit.
First published on 11 October 2022.
Share this article
A new device creates hydrogen from air
Researchers have developed a way to generate hydrogen from air, decoupling production from freshwater resources and providing a new direction for a carbon-free future.
Can infrastructure developments join the circular economy?
New ‘circular’ approaches to manufacturing are emerging, which minimise waste and maximise resource use. Can major infrastructure projects go circular too?
How our cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis
Globally, thousands of governments have declared a climate emergency, but cities have a key role to play in conserving and restoring biodiversity.